Gambling

Gov. Brad Henry and some state legislators have proposed an Oklahoma state lottery to fund education. Is this a good bet or bad public policy for Oklahoma?

Background

As you may know, Sooner-State voters soundly defeated former Gov. David Walters' statewide lottery proposal in 1994 and also another casino gambling legalization measure in 1998. Now, however, because of falling tax revenues, Gov. Henry and a few state lawmakers are once again offering voters the promise of lottery gold, selling an Oklahoma Lottery as something important for the funding of education. Is this true? Would earmarked funds from a lottery really help the public schools? Is a lottery good or bad public policy?

A statewide vote in late summer 2003 has been recently proposed, so Oklahoma citizens may yet get another chance to speak their minds on gambling.

OFPC's Viewpoint

Oklahoma Family Policy Council's position is that a state lottery—in whatever form—is simply bad public policy and problematic for a number of very strong intellectual, economic, philosophical, moral and theological reasons. Many of those reasons are provided for you on the Web-sites and in articles accessed via the links below.

Another consideration: if Oklahomans vote to approve a state lottery (Class III gaming), what impact might their decision have on existing Indian gaming across Oklahoma? Could Las Vegas-style gambling, and all that comes with it, be waiting in the wings? Could gambling expansion be controlled legally? Might legal passage of a state lottery work over time to dramatically change Oklahoma's "Bedford Falls" image—our wonderful, family-friendly atmosphere—into a decadent Pottersville? Maybe.

OFPC asks: on the verge of Oklahoma's exciting Centennial in 2007, why do we, as a young state, want to gamble with Oklahoma's future?

Please click on the following links to learn more about the impact of gambling generally, and state lotteries in particular:

 

Focus on the Family – Dr. James Dobson

For many years, Focus on the Family President Dr. James C. Dobson voluntarily served on the federal government's National Gambling Impact Study Commission. From this unique vantage point, he saw firsthand the negative impact of gambling on individuals, families and society. Understandably, as a result, Focus on the Family's Public-Policy Division provides a wealth of reliable research and information about the gambling issue.

 

National Gambling Impact Study Commission

This official Web-site for the National Gambling Impact Study Commission, now officially closed, but still available for public use, provides a tremendous amount of in-depth information and testimony about the impact of gambling in the U.S.

 

Final Report of the National Gambling Impact Study Commission

This link takes you directly to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission's Final Report, which is quite extensive in scope. Both the Executive Summary and the Full Report are available.

 

Sermon & Sunday-School Outline – Gambling: The Odds Are Against You

What does the Bible teach about gambling? Oklahomans, if they are to exercise their civic duties responsibly, must be educated biblically about this important subject. Pastors, priests and church lay-leaders: OFPC, in association with Focus on the Family, has prepared this sermon outline just for you. Many intellectual, economic, philosophical and moral reasons exist for citizens to oppose legalized gambling, but theological reasons are also very persuasive, and entirely appropriate. Please feel free to print and deliver this important biblically-based message about gambling to your congregation or Sunday-school class. Please distribute it to friends and colleagues, too!

 

Lotteries for Education: Windfall or Hoax?

Professors Donald E. Miller and Patrick A. Pierce systematically and carefully examined the overall fiscal impact on education funding from state lotteries nationwide. This journal article is published in the State & Local Government Review, Vol. 29, (1997): 34-42.

 

The Wager – Harvard Medical School

For eight years, the Harvard Medical School's Division on Addictions, in collaboration with the Massachusetts Council on Compulsive Gambling, has studied the many effects of compulsive gambling on people and society, including the impact of state lotteries. Their weekly publication, The Wager, reports the research findings.

 

National Coalition Against Legalized Gambling – Rev. Tom Grey

Since 1994, the Rev. Tom Grey and his nationwide, broad-based coalition of religious, civic and business leaders—organized under the auspices of the NCALG—have fought hard against the expansion of legalized gambling in the U.S.

 

Citizens for a Sound Economy

Can state governments tax themselves into prosperity, through interesting gimmicks like, e.g., state lotteries? CSE Chief Economist Wayne Brough, Ph.D., says they can't.

 

University of Central Oklahoma

In 2002, the Oklahoma Policy Studies Review, published by the University of Central Oklahoma, offered its readers an informative state-lottery debate between then Sen. Brad Henry, D-Shawnee, and Rep. Forrest Claunch, R-Midwest City, who opposes the lottery [See the Oklahoma Policy Studies Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, (Spring/Summer 2002): 3-7].

 

Hitting the Lottery Jackpot – David Nibert

Published in 2000, David Nibert's excellent book, Hitting the Lottery Jackpot: State Governments and the Taxation of Dreams, provides an exhausive and interesting look at state lotteries and their various effects. The book is available from both Amazon.com and through Nibert's publisher, the New York University Press.

 

The Impact of Earmarked Lottery Revenue on State Educational Expenditures

Newly published in November 2002, this insightful economic analysis of the distribution of lottery revenues nationwide finds that, generally, a dollar of lottery profit earmarked for education funding produces less than a dollar of spending for K-12 public education. However, authors William N. Evans and Ping Zhang also find that, as one might expect, the earmarking of lottery profits itself generally produces more funding for K-12 education than when lottery profits are simply deposited into a state's general fund.

 

The Public Policy Value of State Lotteries

This graduate-level research paper, written in 2001, while noting many of the problems associated with state lotteries, offers a more favorable viewpoint. Particularly interesting is author and Rhodes Scholar Erinn Staley's discussion of the Georgia State Lottery and the Georgia HOPE Scholarship Program, which is often suggested by Gov. Brad Henry as a model for Oklahoma.

 

Earmarked Lottery Revenues for Education: A New Test of Fungibility

Economist Thomas A. Garrett's research finds that education expenditures in an amount equal to net lottery revenues have been diverted to other uses. This fungibility of lottery revenue casts doubt on claims that lotteries have helped education. Fungibility also has serious implications regarding the budgetary tax incidence of lotteries, legislative behavior, and states’ involvement in gaming. Perhaps, most importantly, the fungibility problem also draws into question state officials' primary justification for offering a state-sponsored lottery.

Dr. Garrett's journal article, while not currently available online [See the Journal of Education Finance, Vol. 26, No. 3 (Winter 2001): 219-238], may become available via the federal government's ERIC Document Reproduction Service.

 

Earmarking Tax Revenues for Education: Now You See Them, Now You Don't

In this short 1998 article from The Buckeye Institute, Dr. Thomas Garrett reported that, since the Ohio Lottery was established in 1994, total education spending in Ohio as a percentage of total expenditures actually fell from 42% in 1973 to 29% in 1994. The lottery money was indeed given to the Ohio public schools, but the Ohio Legislature apparently siphoned off education funds for other state programs.

 

Indian Casinos: Wheel of Misfortune

In its Dec. 16, 2002 issue, Time Magazine offered
readers this extensive, multi-part investigative cover story about the negative impact of Indian gaming.

 

National Indian Gaming Association

This trade association represents the Indian gaming industry nationwide. Predictably, NIGA takes issue with Time Magazine, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and other publications that have, in their reporting, viewed Indian gaming with a jaundiced eye.

 

State Lottery – Class III Gaming – Impact of the Federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act

What impact would new legalization of a state lottery (Class III gaming) have on Indian gaming within a state? Would passage of a state lottery mean an open door for casino gambling, too? Would lottery legalization force a state's governor to negotiate a Compact with Indian tribes under the Federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act? In 2001, Tennessee Attorney General Paul G. Summers issued two legal opinions, Opinion No. 01-019 and Opinion No. 01-064, that speak clearly to these very issues.

 

State Lotteries: Advocating a Social Ill for the Social Good

Dr. Michael Heberling, president of the Baker College Center for Graduate Studies in Flint, Mich., argues in this journal article that, after the initial "lottery fever" subsides, most states find themselves spending heavily on marketing and advertising to lure new players and often still raise taxes. Heberling's article was originally published in The Independent Review, Vol. 6, No. 4, (Spring 2002): 597-606.

 

Can States Truly Benefit from State Lotteries: A Look at Lottery Expenditures Toward Education in the American States

After examining the actual experiences of state lotteries and state governments nationwide, authors French and Stanley—both of whom are associated with the John C. Stennis Institute of Government at Mississippi State University—strongly question the bold claims of a coming economic nirvana for education that the lottery promoters promise.

 

The Economic Facts of State-Run Lotteries: Windfall or Hoax

First published in 1997, and updated again recently in 2001, this excellent, thoughtful report by the South Carolina Policy Council cuts through the promises of state lottery marketers and advertisers. Folks, all that glitters isn't gold.

 

In Association with Focus on the Family